In The Federalist No. 84, Hamilton wrote that the Constitution was not intended to regulate which of the following?

In The Federalist No. 84, Hamilton wrote that the Constitution was not intended to regulate which of the following?

• A. The regulation of interstate commerce
• B. The establishment of a strong executive branch
• C. The regulation of every species of personal and private concerns
• D. The power of the states to regulate education

Answer: (C)

The main idea being tested is the limited scope of federal power: the Constitution doesn’t aim to regulate every private or personal matter. In Federalist No. 84, Hamilton argues that the national government operates under delegated, enumerated powers, and it is not meant to micromanage all aspects of private life. Saying that the Constitution was not intended to regulate every species of personal and private concerns captures that point: private life and personal matters are outside the reach of federal authority, leaving room for states and individuals. Interstate commerce, for example, is within the federal purview, so asserting it wasn’t intended to regulate that would misstate the document’s intent. The establishment of a strong executive branch is a constitutional feature, not a claim about private concerns. Education is typically a state matter, but the statement in question focuses on the private sphere more broadly, which is why the description about personal and private concerns is the best fit.

The main idea being tested is the limited scope of federal power: the Constitution doesn’t aim to regulate every private or personal matter. In Federalist No. 84, Hamilton argues that the national government operates under delegated, enumerated powers, and it is not meant to micromanage all aspects of private life. Saying that the Constitution was not intended to regulate every species of personal and private concerns captures that point: private life and personal matters are outside the reach of federal authority, leaving room for states and individuals.

Interstate commerce, for example, is within the federal purview, so asserting it wasn’t intended to regulate that would misstate the document’s intent. The establishment of a strong executive branch is a constitutional feature, not a claim about private concerns. Education is typically a state matter, but the statement in question focuses on the private sphere more broadly, which is why the description about personal and private concerns is the best fit.