Which landmark case established the requirement for warnings and rights waiver before custodial interrogation?

Which landmark case established the requirement for warnings and rights waiver before custodial interrogation?

• A. Marbury v. Madison
• B. Miranda v. Arizona
• C. Brown v. Board of Education
• D. Roe v. Wade

Answer: (B)

When a person is taken into custody and questioned by the police, they must be informed of their rights and given the chance to waive them knowingly. This safeguard comes from Miranda v. Arizona, which established the Miranda rights. The warning typically includes the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, with the reminder that anything said can be used against the person in court. The suspect must knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive these rights for any statements to be admissible. This rule protects the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel during interrogation, and it applies specifically to custodial interrogation—not every police encounter. Other landmark cases listed address different constitutional issues (for example, judicial review, school segregation, and abortion rights) and do not establish the warnings and rights waiver requirement for custodial interrogation.

When a person is taken into custody and questioned by the police, they must be informed of their rights and given the chance to waive them knowingly. This safeguard comes from Miranda v. Arizona, which established the Miranda rights. The warning typically includes the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, with the reminder that anything said can be used against the person in court. The suspect must knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive these rights for any statements to be admissible. This rule protects the Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel during interrogation, and it applies specifically to custodial interrogation—not every police encounter.

Other landmark cases listed address different constitutional issues (for example, judicial review, school segregation, and abortion rights) and do not establish the warnings and rights waiver requirement for custodial interrogation.